12 naughty ways to economize at Christmas [link]

Via the terrific Girl on the Right Blog, these helpful suggestion from A. Nonymous:

Most of us are not doing God’s work trading credit derivatives at Goldman Sachs. You may be stunned when I tell you this, because I sure as heck was when I found out: the TARP program covers none of our credit card bills. Like, zero. All of that means another tough, tough Christmas, money-wise. The desperate economy calls for desperate measures to economize at Christmas. Here are twelve ways for the twelve days:

1. The first thing to do is to keep doing more of what you’re already doing: bitching and complaining. Cry poor mouth to everyone. Tell everyone you know how tough it is. Make a Bill Clinton face while you share people’s pain and make them feel yours. Next you say, “You know, let’s make it easy this year, you don’t have to buy me anything.” Of course, that means you don’t have an obligation to buy them anything! That works with everyone except your kids.

2. Tell your young kids Santa’s not real. Kids as young as four are old enough to get real in this day and age. In Indonesia and Pakistan kids are out sewing soccer balls to support a family at that age! So just explain to them that it’s all a scam meant to con them into good behavior, tell them how much you know they wouldn’t want to connive in such a fraud, and assure them you know they’ll behave perfectly well without bribery. They’ll thank you. Someday.

3. What about the older kids? They’re all so eco-conscious these days, and that’s an opportunity for the canny cheapskate. Just tell them instead of lame games for Wii and Xbox this year, you’re saving the planet on their behalf by planting a tree with their name on it in the Amazon! You can even work up some kind of authentic-looking certificate on the computer! People in the carbon-credit business are becoming billionaires doing just that, by the way.

4. You still feel you need some real gifts? Well how about re-gifts? You’ve been given things you never opened — herbal soap, crème brûlée mix, thermal bags for keeping wine cold — pass the parcel! Just try to remember not to give it to the person that gave it to you!

5. Books are such a popular item at Christmas. So many books can be had for free! Libraries put out boxes of new, unread, unmarked books that they want to get rid of. These include books about business, money, and investing that are still very attractive and were timely when they were published last year, but are entirely irrelevant under current conditions. Also look for container-loads of books about the Bush and Clinton administrations, and anything by Dick Morris. I don’t normally advocate illegal behavior, but one exception could be Saul Alinsky’s Rules For Radicals. Bookstores are full of this one – it’s the Obama playbook! Somehow it just seems right to go in there and liberate a copy or three, comrade!

6. One of my cheap-ass friends used to always joke, “I wanted to buy you a big plant for Christmas, but GM wouldn’t sell.” What a laff riot, and it got him off the hook for ever buying anything! Of course, now GM desperately wants to sell all its plants, so the 2009 revision of that joke is, “I wanted to buy you a big plant for Christmas, but the Chinese bought them all!” Ha ha! Your friends
will be falling over, and they won’t even notice you didn’t buy a round of drinks!

7. Speaking of drinks, ‘tis the season to bend the elbow, so herewith some recommendations from Chateau Wang. First, drink cheap beer. The cheapest stuff in my local is also the original and greatest . . . it’s Miller at $3.99 a six-pack, compared to $5.29 for Miller Light. That make any sense to you? Me neither, they take stuff out and charge you more? Forget that! Next, drink cheap wine. André’s Cold Duck is back, it’s $4.99, and it’s as good as it was when you were fourteen and sneaked it in the kitchen after the Thanksgiving dinner was cleared away. (You know you did.)

8. As for food, the trick to economizing on food is not to cook any. Instead, head over to your brother’s house and scrounge Christmas dinner there. You need to go unannounced, early in the day, in case they have the same idea of coming over and scrounging from you. If that was the plan and your sister-in-law makes no move to put a turkey in the oven, give her one of your Miller’s and she’ll at least come through with some Dinty Moore. Note: If you were to show up on the doorstep at 7:00 AM, there are secondary benefits – you can reconnect with the Christmases of your childhood, when you punished everyone by getting up too early, and you’ll get breakfast too.

9. Here are the hard liquor recommendations from Chateau Wang. You want to drink cheap, cheap liquor too. The venerable and cheap bourbons and ryes from Old Huckaby, Rebel Heaven, and Elihu Walton lack the sophistication of single-malt Scotch, but they have all of the wallop! Also consider cheap and nasty tequila like Don Cheech and Señor Pepe brand – they mix great with green Gatorade!

10. You don’t feel you can scrounge 100% at your sister-in-law’s house? Try this recipe that will cost about 25 cents: Mix two cups of flour with a quarter teaspoon each of baking power and salt, and add up to two cups of water to make a heavy dough. Add a few raisins if you have any, tie it up in a clean handkerchief, and boil it in water until it’s time to go home. Then discard it. Tell them it’s
the dumpling Oliver Twist had in the workhouse at Christmas. Your brother’s family doesn’t read! They won’t know! Ha ha! Give them a copy of Rules For Radicals.

11. Christmas trees are $60 at the VFW, and wreaths are $20. That make any sense to you? Me neither, so here you have many ways to go. You could wait until 4:30 on Christmas Eve, by which time the guy working at VFW will have gone home and abandoned whatever Charlie Brown Christmas trees he has left. Freebie! Option two, you may live in a place where trees are plentiful all around – neighbor’s yards, parks, and so on, if you “catch” my “drift” (wink wink!) Freebie! Another idea, if Border’s Bookstore actually survives far into this Christmas season, you may be able to buy one of the jokey artificial trees they had there last year – these things were some kind of intellectual joke, made with like a few bare wires covered in tinsel; this choice shows a certain post-modern hauteur which goes very well with Dinty Moore and Cold Duck. It’s about $5.99. But you can make it yourself, using wire coat-hangers, spray adhesive, and metallic flock or confetti. That’s a good thing!

12. Finally, we have to get control of this holiday again. Twelve days my wonderful arse! Our Jewish neighbors get by with just eight nights for Hanukkah, and even that is way too much noodle pudding. Let’s do away with this business of Christmas as a 3-month long retail opportunity. The retailers have been unloading container loads of useless crap from Yiwu, China into their Christmas displays since just after Labor Day! With the cheap and nasty Christmas I have outlined here, we can let them know that that is just not the way we want to be living anymore.

Have a happy.

Jobs Summit at the White House

From Politico 44: You're invited -- On the jobs summit list ...

"CONFIRMED ATTENDEES INCLUDE: Eric Schmidt, Google; Randall Stevenson, AT&T; Surya Mohapatra, Qwest ; Frederick Smith, Fed Ex; Brian Roberts, Comcast; Bob Iger, Disney; James McNerney, Boeing; Andrew Livens, Dow; Peter Solmssen, Siemens; Stephanie Burns, Dow Corning; Phaedra Ellis Lamkins, Green for All; Reed Hundt, Coalition for the Green Bank; Larry Mishel, EPI; Alan Blinder, Princeton; Paul Krugman, Princeton; Joe Stiglitz, Columbia; Bob Greenstein, Center on Budget and Policy Priorities; and Jeffrey Sachs, Columbia. PLUS SMALL BUSINESS OWNERS, including David Ickert, Air Tractor; Woody Hall, Diversapack; and Rose Wang, Binary Group. AND Anna Burger, Change to Win; Leo Gerard, United Steel Workers; Joe Hansen, United Food and Commercial Workers; Randi Weingarten, AFT; Mayor Frank Cownie, Des Moines; Mayor Julian Castro, San Antonio; and Mayor Ed Pawlowski, Allentown, Pa."

In other (Grayling) words, we have (1) big contributors whose large corporations have been laying off workers, (2) union leaders who represent barely one-in-ten US workers and whose grasping has sent jobs overseas, (3) leftist economists, (4) war-horses of the DC policy establishment, (5) members of the red-green coalition, (6) political allies, and (7) a few small business people of whom nothing is known.


THE CRISIS IN EMPLOYMENT IS REAL. Nothing that will come out of this jobs summit will have any effect on it, however. Exhorting industry to hire will not. Shaming banks into extending more credit to business will not. Temporary subsidies and $3000 new-hire tax credits will not. Make-work schemes will not. Enterprises will not hire or commit any new resources as long as their tax and regulatory regimes are totally unsettled, as they are with this anti-enterprise statist administration. Business owners do not know what they face in terms of higher taxes and giant mandates for health care, cap-and-tax, and other pet "make-the-rich-pay" schemes of the left. But they do know for certain that these things will be burdensome, and maybe fatal. No sensible business person will hire or invest under such threat.

Better to milk your business for cash to consume while you can. Maybe now's the time to move offshore. The Chinese Communists are more business friendly than the US Democrats, and probably easier to deal with than the United Steel Workers or United Food and Commercial Workers.

Mao nostalgia in China

On October 1, the People's Republic of China marked its 60th anniversary with an impressive military parade, musical performances and portraits of Sun Yat-sen, Deng Xiaoping, and Mao Zedong.

It's the occasion for a boomlet for Mao nostalgia in China. This, one can kind of understand. He was the founder of the PRC. After liquidating his rivals, he was the maximum leader of the Chinese Communist Party.

Here's today's article on the nostalgia for Mao in China: Mao presides again in China as nostalgia runs high. It's fun stuff. Young people who don't know more about him than his name and image are taking the commercial opportunity to sell T-shirts, hats, badges and snow globes.

In the US, within the Obama administration, Mao Zedong is also enjoying a revival. Communications Director Anita Dunn commends him as a political philosopher to the graduating class of a parochial school. Manufacturing Czar Ron Bloom cites with approval Mao's saying that "Political power grows out of the barrel of a gun" ["Problems of War and Strategy" (November 6, 1938), Selected Works, Vol. II, p. 224].

The thing is this. In China, it is not Mao's Communism that is being celebrated; the country has spent the last thirty years correcting the leftist errors of the previous thirty. Apart from the retail opportunity, Mao's real reputation in China is as a nationalist (not a Nationalist, which in China is a different thing):

1 Mao would work with anyone, anywhere to resist Japanese aggression, including the Nationalists or the Americans, even to the extent of putting the Red Army under their command.

2 Mao unified the war-torn Chinese mainland under Chinese rule for the first time since 1644.

3 In its first five years, the PRC under Mao was drawn into superpower conflict with the US in Korea, and managed to stay in the fight with the nuclear-armed US to secure a draw on the peninsula.

4 When Mao fell out with Khruschev, the PRC found itself surrounded by enemies: the USSR to the north, Taiwan with its US backing to the east, India with its designs on Tibet and implicit backing of the UK, US, and USSR to the south. Mao prosecuted a war in the Himalayas and backed them all down, sustaining the country's independence through a dangerous time.

5 Forty-five years ago this week, the PRC got the bomb; if any of the other powers thought attacking China would be easy, after that it meant mutually assured destruction.

6 When the time came for a new way forward, Mao came to terms with Richard Nixon, and it was easy for the two cold warriors, as if getting reacquainted with old friends. This upset the balance of power in the far east, putting the USSR on the defensive. As much as the US played the China card, China played the America card.

Seek truth from facts, as Deng Xiaoping always said. Mao Zedong's reputation in his homeland has very little to do with his Communism at this stage, and everything to do with his nationalism. Which is fine -- it is his homeland after all.

But like many others, I would like to know just what it is that his highly-placed admirers in the US Obama administration are getting out of Mao Zedong at this time.

Book extract on Chinese history

China’s people take pride and inspiration from their history, but it can be burdensome too in some respects. The Sinologist Lucian Pye referred to “the millstone of greatness”, noting that “awareness of the greatness of Chinese civilization, together with an appreciation of the distinctiveness of ‘Chineseness,’ is universal”, not least among the Chinese themselves. They never forget that they are the heirs to a unique, identifiably Chinese civilization which arose in the valley of the Yellow River and endured continuously through the last four thousand years of recorded history. On the one hand, the burden is to have so much to live up to; on the other, it is a source of considerable frustration that their universally acknowledged greatness has so seldom translated into peace, prosperity, and a good life for the Chinese people.

Lu Xun, China’s great modern writer and scathing social critic, captures that frustration as he dismisses the entire enterprise of Chinese historiography:

But however fine the phrases of those splendour-loving scholars, or however grand the expressions they use in their chronicles, such as "the rise of the Hans," "the age of Han expansion," or "the age of Han resurgence," while appreciating that their motives are of the best, we cannot but feel their wording is too ambiguous. A much more straightforward mode of expression would be:

1. The periods when we longed in vain to be slaves.
2. The periods when we succeeded in becoming slaves for a time.

These periods form a cycle of what earlier scholars call "times of good rule" and "times of confusion." [Lu Xun National Characteristics 2 150-]

Lu Xun was writing his polemics during yet another time of confusion, after one Chinese empire had fallen, before what was to come had really taken shape. If he was not a man of the left, he certainly admired the Soviet Union and thought its model worth considering for the modernization, democratization, and independence of China. He includes a reminder to us that down through the ages, the great historic achievements of great men were the endeavor of one-twentieth, one-fiftieth, or as little as one-hundredth of the population, of no positive moment to the great mass of the Chinese people who labored mutely on the land, desperately trying to stay alive, produce enough to pay taxes, and escape undue attention of the Emperor’s officials. But when the great men failed or turned out to be evil men, it was the common folk who paid with their lives, hundreds of millions of lives, so many that the mind simply balks.

Book extract on Confucius & The Way

The Chinese concept of the Way, or Tao, was current before Confucius lived or taught; the Books of Odes and Rites tell of Heaven, and reveal beliefs in ancestor-spirits and a supreme being with a human face. However, Tzu-kung reports that “one cannot get to hear [Confucius’] views on human nature and the Way of Heaven. (V, 13, 78) Confucius does not conjecture about the nature of God or Heaven, but he felt the full force of Heaven’s Decree upon him, and suggested that shame is the feeling of falling afoul of the Way of Heaven: “When you have offended against Heaven, there is nowhere you can turn in your prayers.” (III, 13, 69) The subject of Confucius’ teaching is not the nature of man, but man’s conduct. It is not the Way of Heaven in the sense of ultimate truth about the universe, but rather in the most down-to-earth sense of each person and each state acting dutifully, benevolently, in compliance with the Rites, outward form conferring inward grace. Confucius’ Way is in no means mystical. It can be learned, and taught. “The Gentleman . . . goes to men possessed of the Way to be put right. Such a man can be described as eager to learn.” (I, 14, 61) The fact that Confucius’ conception of the Way relies on learned forms rather than mystical revelation does not make it any less a matter of life and death:

The Master said, “He has not lived in vain who dies the day he is told about the Way.” (IV, 8, 73)

When the ruler governs according to the Golden Mean, observes the Rites, and follows the Way, he brings his state to a condition of harmony, for “when the Way prevails in the Empire, the Commoners do not express critical views.” (XVI, 2, 139) In this dialogue with the senior minister of the State of Lu, Confucius asserts that the Way is all the ruler needs, rebuking the Legalist School of philosophy and every gang of thugs and killers to assume power from his own time down through the ages:

Chi K’ang Tzu asked Confucius about government, saying, “What would you think if, in order to move closer to those who possess the Way, I were to kill those who do not follow the Way?

Confucius answered, “In administering your government, what need is there for you to kill? Just desire the good yourself and the common people will be good. The virtue of the Gentleman is like the wind; the virtue of the small man is like the grass. Let the wind blow over the grass and it is sure to bend.” (XII, 19, 114-115)

With his reverence for precedent and antiquity, his abiding conservatism, and his conception of a hierarchical society led by benevolent example, Confucius could be either an instrument or an impediment to the rulers of China. To some, he was both at the same time.

Read Reed Hundt's book, "In China's Shadow"

If you want to understand Democrat fantasies in the absence of financial constraint or common sense, read Reed Hundt's book, "In China's Shadow." Reed Hundt is a permanent member of the American politcal class, a Yalie, a partner in a high-powered law firm, head of Bill Clinton's FCC, and a member of Barack Obama's transition team.

Free money is Reed Hundt's great idea. Muggins, that is you & me, the hard-pressed American taxpayer, should buy everyone from Nome to Tierra del Fuego a pension, healthcare, and education. By these means, the United States will win in the economic competition with China that furnishes the title of his book and a small fraction of its other content.

No, it's not a joke. People with power and influence really think this way.

Financial Market Conditions at Mid-Year

As one of the many Americans who depends on a positive business and investment environment for his prosperity, I regarded the election of Barack Obama as president with Democrat supermajorities in the House and Senate with some concern.

More than the usual number of my fellow businesspeople and investors went over to that side, contrary to their own interest as it always seemed to me. Of course many of these unlikely Obama voters were as eager for hope and change after eight years of George Bush as anyone else. But if they gave consideration to the implications of Democrats supermajorities led by Obama for the economy from which they draw life and livelihood, they allowed their desire to believe to outweigh more sober analysis.

Obama took them in with the charisma, the gaseous uplift, and the promise of racial reconciliation; they convinced themselves that the redistribtionist, high-tax, anti-business, anti-capital policies to which he rallied his party constituted red meat for the Democrat base, not a program for governing.

This misapprehension survived the election, and permitted modest financial market recovery through the end of December 2008, followed by modest declines through Inauguration Day. On Inauguration Day, President Obama delivered a speech that any fair-minded listener would have to admit was far less than a rhetorical tour de force, and far more evocative of class envy and racial struggle than everyone expected.

Financial markets tanked that day and kept tanking for weeks, pressured further by the stimulus package that offered precious little real economic stimulus, but rather a shocking grab bag of packages to traditional Democrat constituencies, with not the merest nod to the rights or concerns of the minority.

We experienced headlong collapse from Inauguration Day through first week of March. Obama Democrats in the business and investment community awoke too late to the realization that the Democrat program now encompasses nationalization of vast swathes of industry on the pretext of emergency (autos and banks) or necessity (health care); that owners' property rights are provisional and expendable; that the ideological attachment of our rulers' to the green agenda trumps their duty of care to the free-market economy; and that they mean to bleed the productive sectors of the economy to feed the non-productive to the fullest possible extent they can get away with.

So far, so bad. But then something interesting happened -- we had a dramatic bounce in stock markets from March through early May. Some of this is probably discounting the possibility of a 1929-37 depression, correctly. Some might even be what I regard as an unrealistic pricing in of a rapid economic recovery, when what we still have in prospect is a deep and long recession as in the 70s and early 80s.

But some of the bounce is almost certainly due to the business and investment interests of this country re-assessing President Obama's grand and ambitious schemes and concluding that they represent impossible over-reach. Rightly or wrongly, they came around to the view that most of this stuff will never come to pass. On this view, Obama has expressed extreme initial positions just as a negotiating tactic to get more than he could with conventional bipartisanship, but less than he asks. Republicans and responsible Democrats in Congress will push back on the crazier ideas. The American people will not go along, will resist with mute passive aggressiveness and loud argumentation, once the full implications are clear. And if it is not just a tactic, if Obama really insists on every bit of what he says, Republicans will gain enough seats in 2010 to apply the brakes, if not an outright majority. One way or another, the entire Obama agenda can and will be resisted.

This is a bull item in the market since March.

After stock price gains of over 30% from March to May, markets have stalled since then, and fallen into a few air pockets. The public policy problems for the markets at this point remain the administration's apparent readiness to overturn our carbon energy-based economy and its radical intentions toward the 15% of the economy that health care represents.

But the overarching sentiment problem comes from yet another reassessment among business people and investors: even if the entire Obama agenda can be resisted and its worst effects rolled back later, on this new view a tremendous amount of violence can still be done to the U.S. economy now. In the meantime, we are still losing jobs at a sickening pace while Obama and the Congress waste unimaginable sums of money on projects lacking any other point beside paying off their friends and allies.

In the background the Chinese, our principal creditors, are objecting more and more forcefully to American fiscal unsustainability and the debasement of the U.S. Dollar that this portends. The managers of other erstwhile basket-case economies, Russia, India, and Brazil, tut-tut their agreement and back calls for changes to the global reserve system.

At the very least, these mid-year movements call upon investors to review their portfolio allocations with care. My own view is currently defensive on U.S. Dollar assets, light in risk assets in general, and seeking for growth mainly in Chinese stocks.

Chinese Business Naming: Baby Banana Fettewql, etc.

I once met with a company in China. It had a great business plan for its proprietary skin care products for men, terrific sales pitch to go with the products, attractive product design and logo. Altogether pretty credible, until you got to the name. Who told them it was a good idea to pick a Chinese name that transliterates to something that sounds exactly like "Lady Man"?

A lot of regular guys feel mildly conflicted about using any product beside the traditional soap and shaving cream on their skin. Offering them Lady Man brand products is going to queer the deal, probably for good.

The Lady Man men have an elaborate explanation of how they came up with their names, trademarks, and trade dress, all of which is really beside the point. They have made the mistake of being unintentionally ridiculous in a major world language. Of course they are not the first or the biggest to do so. Many of us have heard how General Motors struggled to sell Nova’s in Latin America at a time that it apparently had no Spanish speakers on staff to point out that “no va” is Spanish for “doesn’t go.”

There are hundreds of world languages, and no doubt almost everything is ridiculous to some linguistic community or other. For the brand manager it might be OK if your name is smutty in Sinhalese, hilarious in Hittite, or politically incorrect in Papuan, as long as it is OK in all the majors. On the other hand, if you sell Iran’s market-leading detergent Barf, you don’t worry because your customers do not know or care why Americans think that is so funny.

But back to Lady Man. This is one small particular instance of problematic product/business naming in China, where companies are thinking big, trying to graduate from producing dollar-store fodder and white-label products for foreign brand owners to developing international brands in their own right. They need to know that getting the right name is the first and most important part of this, because you are not a brand unless customers ask for you by name.

Some Chinese companies are going international with their Chinese name, transliterated into foreign script -- for example Huaxin Cement, Hai'er Appliances, and Tsingtao Beer. This follows the example of many Japanese and Korean competitors (e.g. Toyota, Samsung). It takes confidence and a willingness to hear foreigners mispronounce your language. It is working pretty well for Hai'er as they establish their brand worldwide.

Other Chinese companies venture out into the wide world with their Chinese name translated into foreign language -- Snow Lotus Cashmere, White Cat Laundry Detergent. These brand names can seem quaintly "Chinese-y" to foreign ears.

It is common for companies and brands all over the world to bear the name of their founder or animating spirit, and this seldom presents any problems. With the growth of individual enterprise and entrepreneurial culture in China, we can expect to see more labels and brands bearing the name of the real people behind them. Yue Sai-Kan had turned herself into a brand before the personal branding consultants in the U.S. ever thought of such a thing. Han Feng, the Shanghai-based fashion designer, is my favorite example in the fashion industry, one of the businesses I know best.

For fashion and allied businesses such as cosmetics and salon and spa services, the Chinese consumer values foreign experiences and foreign brands far above homespun Chinese, so the smart domestic entrepreneur picks an evocative personal name, place name, or foreign language word. In big city malls, the fashion brand Sao Paulo is side by side with Only, Less, and a Korean competitor that rejoices in the name of Mojo S. Phine NY. But it remains to be seen whether Sao Paulo the Chinese fashion brand can gain a following in Sao Paulo the Brazilian business capital.

How about using the Chinese proprietors' names together with foreign language words? Cindy Luo's label Omnialuo reaches for the classics -- the name of her line is literally "all things Luo" in Latin. Will Omnialuo mean anything to modern consumers in the western world? It just might, if they can learn to say it.

But from there things go downhill in some significant respects.

For purposes of this discussion we are concerned with legitimate business, rather than the products of intellectual property theft, made-in-China copies of foreign products with stolen brands and trademarks that make up 7% of global branded consumer product sales according to one estimate. This is criminal activity, understood as such by all concerned.

But in China and even in China's near-abroad, many Chinese companies sell own-design products under close facsimiles of well-known foreign brand names and trademarks -- there are Prader, Pal Zingeri, Dunhïll, and dozens of others, including countless variations on the name and trademark of Valentino, the leading IP victim according to my research. The foreign brand owners object to this abuse of their IP too, but the purveyors of this stuff go about their little activities unmolested. To the extent that these near-knockoffs make it into mainstream outlets such as Isetan in shopping Meccas like Kuala Lumpur, the IP originators can legitimately complain of real displacement and lost sales.

There are facsimile trademarks that rely for their effect on the font style rather than the actual names. In Guangzhou I saw a Frognie Zila store with the name rendered unmistakably in the font style used by Ermengildo Zegna.

One other case that fascinates me is the "Polo" name. There once was a bright, ambitious chap from the Bronx named Ralph Lifshitz who understood the value of names. He changed his own name to Ralph Lauren and called his fashion lines Polo. Ralph has tried to claim a proprietary right to the name and has even disputed the use by the sport's governing body of a polo player logo in its licensed apparel. But because Polo the sport has been around longer than Polo the brands, there is a little space for others to squeeze into, especially outside the U.S. where Ralph and other litigious parties are less likely to prevail. So in China, "Polo" has become a name applied indiscriminately and in dozens of variations to every kind of luggage and leather goods – “New York Polo”, “Polo Club”, “Polo Golf” -- if you can’t identify fifteen different Chinese Polos at a baggage carousel in any mainland airport, I’ll eat a polo mallet. The original and best Chinese Polo is simply Polo, and the proprietor is a friend of my family. His leather goods are excellent and his business operations in Beijing and Guangzhou are substantial. If his brand name did not bring him into conflict with industry heavyweight Lifshitz, er, Lauren, he would have a sure shot at success in international markets.

If abuse of foreign trademarks is a concern, abuse of foreign language is just a laugh. Visitors to China derive hours of amusement from the weird and wonderful uses to which random foreign letters, words, and texts are put there. In the men’s room in Jinan’s airport is a sign that says “Protect Environment Saving Bumf.” I don’t know what Bumf is, but sure, let’s save it. And while we’re at it let’s also save Chinese brand owners some grief by letting them know that silly confections such as Marisfrolg, Baby Banana Fettewql, and Biemlfdlkk are probably not going to work at the Mall of America.

My father told me, “Don’t try to be clever sonny, just be yourself.” It is good advice, which many in Chinese industry lack the self-confidence to employ despite the good progress of Hai'er and others: Just be yourself. The Japanese are always and everywhere themselves. At some early stage, Toyota decided to be Toyota rather than Forb or Fiak (or Fiaklfdlkk). Shiseido did not try to pass itself off as Channel. Yohji Yamamoto did not change his name to Johhny Valentino. Would it be too much to ask our Chinese friends, in just this one respect perhaps, to look at the Japanese and take a page from their book?

More Beijing Fashion Week Photos on Facebook

http://www.facebook.com/photos.php?id=1590283860

Enjoy.

China's fiscal deficit -3% of GDP

What is the US up to now in the Obama budget, 8%? 10%

Big Economic News From China

We have CCTV4 (China Central TV Channel 4) in our house and at the moment Premier Wen Jiabao is delivering a major speech about economic stimulus. Here are a few of my notes.

The Chinese Communists are cutting corporate taxes, cutting capital gains taxes, cutting stock transfer taxes, promoting the motor industry and the housing market, promising to complete major recovery efforts for the Sichuan earthquake zone this year, and committing themselves to major infrastructure projects, agricultural and rural development, and much more. They are not giving up on their earlier forecast of 8% GDP growth for 2009.

Premier Wen's delivery is certain and confident. He is at pains to remind government officials that this is the people's money they are committing, and not "yi fen" (one penny) is to waste. The objective is to increase productivity in the Chinese economy and support employment in productive industry, and not promote make-work schemes or screwdriver assembly industry. Apart from this feint in the direction of industrial policy, the plan is highly market-oriented. It is detailed, fully-formed and ready to implement.

The Chinese Communist Party, which once said "Whatever you do never forget Class Struggle," has forgotten class struggle. There is apparently nothing in the Chinese plan for condoms, community organizers, or Maglev trains from senior politicians' districts to Disneyland.

You just have to be bullish on China. It is hard to argue that China will not emerge from the current financial crisis relatively stronger than before.

More later.

Fashion model

Because who wouldn't want to look at this fashion model? What a doll. She and I MC'd an event together in Beijing.

Kung Pao Chinese Stocks Ding

I worked in China from 1986-88. People I trained were later instrumental in the establishment of Chinese securities markets. Some of what I did, as theoretical as it seemed then, helped lay a basis for their subsequent development. Before there were Chinese stocks, I owned Chinese bonds. When the first issue of Chinese shares was offered to foreign investors, China Southern Glass in 1991, my company bought in.

I have been involved in modern China’s financial system since before its creation, and stayed involved continuously. So let’s declare biases honestly and note that I am not impartial. I am called a China hand by my Chinese friends, and dismissed as an apologist by . . . others. I’m not a dreamy China head (though I did go through that dreamy China head phase for about three weeks in 1986). I am sharply critical of what I see as deficiencies of their system.

I have been fortunate to make money in Chinese financial markets. Sometimes it has been a simple matter of doing the diametric opposite of whatever the top Wall Street firms advise in their China strategy. But when they have gotten it right and their clients have done well, as during the latest Chinese bull markets, it has been a wonderful thing to see. I’m glad so many people have good success, because in the 90s it sometimes seemed that everyone who ever invested in China lost money and ended up sour on the experience.

Certainly there have been problems that have bedeviled the Chinese markets all these years.

As a nominally communist country, China struggled at first with the very concept of financial markets. When they began to be introduced in the late 80s, they were described as “experimental.” The designation endured for a long time. It is not much of an endorsement, is it? “Welcome Capitalist Roaders to Invest in Our Experimental Markets that We Might Shut Down if We Don’t Like the Way it Goes.”

If markets were purely experimental, the social scientists running the experiment figured they might as well do lots of trials. To that end, the Chinese markets have been finely sliced and diced like Kung Pao Chicken Ding. The authorities set up a Shanghai A share market for local people and a Shanghai B share market for foreigners. Then they replicated the pair in Shenzhen – that’s four venues in China for the trading of Chinese shares. Two classes of Chinese shares, the H shares and the Red Chips, traded in Hong Kong. There were N shares, for which the initial listing was on the NYSE – China Brilliance (CBA), Shandong Huaneng (SH), and Huaneng International (HNP). Later they lost control of the process, and various stray Chinese companies did IPOs in Singapore, Tokyo, Sydney, London, and I lose track of where all else. There has been a major boom in backdoor listings of Chinese companies on junior stock exchanges around the world.

And that’s a big problem – no one can keep track. If I want Italian shares, I pretty much know where to look. If I want Chinese shares, where do I start?

(I met a Chinese market regulator, an executive of the Chinese Securities Regulatory commission, in May 2007 during the raging bull market. He was in a self-congratulatory mood, and invited me to offer congratulations too. I demurred, and instead took the opportunity to point out that their sclerotic regulatory process had prevented too many decent Chinese issuers from doing IPOs in the Chinese markets where home-team investors would most welcome them, sending them instead to go for Rube-Goldberg RTO and SPAC listings on junior stock exchanges abroad where they would struggle to gain a following or a fair valuation.)

The B share markets in particular became bogged down in a morass of low liquidity and poor quality. There were a few corporate governance issues. Many foreign institutions believed that the Chinese securities market experiment was designed to let the Chinese government move garbage off its books into foreign portfolios. I have had big investors tell me with a straight face that they assumed the Chinese meant to hose them.

Some of the international stock offerings have had that effect, but I don’t believe it was ever intentional or malicious. The Chinese thought they would impress us by making their biggest enterprises available to us – their giant steelworks, shipyards, and petrochemical complexes. It turns out that bigger is not better. The social burdens on these cities-within-factory were hard to lift.

It can be quantitatively proven that the closer a share gets to the domestic Chinese investor the better the average quality, if such a concept can be distilled from growth rates and balance sheet items. H shares that do not also list A shares are worse than H shares that do, and A shares that do not issue any class of share to foreigners are of the best quality. I have done the work on this. I’ll report the research in this space shortly.

More than one fund manager has rejected my research finding, without offering to rework the numbers. But the alternative is to believe that they have sold us better stuff than they sold themselves. Does that make sense to you? No, it is intuitively hard to accept. It could not be, because whole attractive parts of the Chinese economy, including retail/wholesale trade and part of the telecom and media space, have been off limits to foreign investment in the past or even now. That alone would raise the quality of the average domestic Chinese share, and it has nothing to do with the Chinese government going out of its way to dump its garbage on foreigners.

If you run an international mutual fund, then the Chinese markets are just one part of your opportunity set. Given that they are sliced and diced beyond comprehension and riddled with pockets of low liquidity and poor quality, you could always make the case that it’s more bother than it’s worth.

But if you are a domestic Chinese saver, then Chinese A shares are a huge part of your opportunity set. As a Chinese investor, what alternatives do you have? Interest rates on bank deposits have been reduced from 24% to very, very small, bonds are not popular, and real estate is relatively illiquid. And some of the stocks in the opportunity set are really good after all.

For most of the time, this fact has eluded detection by the so-called experts of Wall Street, who have not generally examined domestic Chinese shares as long as they remained off-limits to their international clientele. But one feature of this latest bull market has been that some foreign investors are gaining access to the domestic Chinese opportunity set, while some Chinese investors are venturing abroad. That means Chinese investors, at least the biggest exemplars of the breed, are now clients of Wall Street, and Wall Street had to open its mind and its eyes and assign some analysts to take a look at the A shares.

Formerly, when the A share markets have gone crazy on the upside every once in a while, the foreign brokers who ostensibly “cover” Chinese markets have had nothing to say. These periodic bull moves have been totally incomprehensible to them. Don’t they just prove how stupid and gullible the Chinese individual investor is? Well, no . . . there has been another obvious conclusion, but these foreigners have not always had enough information to arrive at it. That conclusion is: some domestic shares are good, and there is a time and place to buy them, if you can.

China is complicated. More than once I have had to argue with analysts over points of fact – not opinion, fact -- arguments of the Kafkaesque “Black is white” variety. Well, the facts are sometimes obscure. So who does Wall Street send to deal with this most confusing and delicate market? Often its youngest, least experienced, least capable analysts, of course! Since China is relatively speaking a small part of the global opportunity set, why send a top gun analyst? You need that guy back in Hongkong to write the thirtieth report this week on HSBC.

So what is changing these problems? The passage of time. The action of price, making China a bigger piece of global market capitalization, bringing in more investors in the good times and lately attracting more critical scrutiny in the bad. How about regulation? The financial markets’ place in modern China is not the subject of an experiment anymore. They are clearly here to stay. With this belated acceptance the worst of the slicing and dicing should be undone. Short of allowing A and B share markets to merge, the regulators can easily allow domestic investors to gain access to B and H shares and expand foreigners’ access to A shares. My sense is that China emerges from the current global financial crisis with its relative position enhanced compared to other economic players. It has national savings, it has surpluses, it can adjust policy at short notice. Sclerosis now is a bigger problem for the developed west.

I still hope for root and branch restructuring of the regulatory system that allows these changes and many others to come more quickly. But my CSRC official as well as many other Chinese advise me not to hold my breath. Even though it is a relatively new bureaucracy, it is still a bureaucracy, and an entrenched, calcified one at that.

Louis Vuitton in Shenyang, China at night

Yep, that's their store.



This would be the same China that Peter Morici called the most protectionist country in the history of the world.

Conformity to Chinese Practice

On a message thread about manufacturing in China, someone said the usual thing about Chinese disregarding our patents and ripping off our IP. No doubt this is a problem. Let's remember, though: the main thing patents & copyrights confer is a right to sue, which is minimal protection from a determined infringer whether in China, America, or wherever.

Coming out of this economic crisis, I am thinking that we will are going to be adjusting ourselves to Chinese ways of doing business more than we think. Their movement toward conformity with our practice on IP and other things has probably gone as far as it will for now. In China they have the surpluses, and we in the U.S. with our deficits are going to them cap in hand.

Already I get from my Chinese partners the confidence in their own ways that the Japanese exhibited at their peak in the 80s: "Why should we listen to you? Look at the bad situation you're in."

As far as IP theft is concerned, I have mixed feelings. Historically Americans have not always been on the side of the angels: Dickens notoriously had trouble getting paid for his books in the US. Funny how becoming the major producer of IP has turned us so righteous about IPR.

I love the story about English and Chinese potters learning from each other by copying each other in the 17th century. The English copied the Chinese, the Chinese thought the copies were great and they copied the copies, and so on, to the enrichment of both sides'production.

And the Chinese have a respectable tradition of copying going back to the Han dynasty. After the Qin destroyed all the written literature of the country, Han scribes set about recovering by copying the remnants.

In our world, there is so much sampling in music and visual arts that, anyway, originality belongs in quotes.

Trade Restrictions? Won't Help You

The administration, the managed-trade segment of the policy establishment, and the labor unions should consider the experience of the auto industry. General Motors, Ford and Chrysler strong-armed Japan’s auto industry to accept voluntary export restraints (VERs) in the mid-80s. The results of the VERs are named Lexus, Acura, and Infiniti. The Japanese motor industry drove up-market and developed an unassailable reputation for superior quality, not only in their luxury marques but across their full lines. Meanwhile the market share of U.S. motor nameplates dropped from 74% in 1985 to barely 60% in 2004 in spite of the VERs. Now it is worse, and one or more of Detroit’s former big three may not survive.

VERs made negligible difference to Detroit's rate of market share erosion. Take a look market share data from 1970 through 2004 (Sources - US Dept. of Commerce, Ward’s Automotive Yearbook, D H Smith):

Beat up trade partners over exchange rates? No!

American trading experience with Japan shows there’s much more to trade balances than just the exchange rate, and beating up trading partners over exchange rates is useless. In 1985, the Japanese yen traded at 250 to the dollar, and Japan ran a $46 billion surplus with America. In spite of billions wasted by the Bank of Japan in costly and ineffectual currency market intervention between 1985 and 2005, the value of the yen more than doubled to 109 per dollar. During the same two decades, Japanese industry suffered barriers against its motorcycles, semiconductors, and steel in the U.S. market, accepted voluntary export restraints on cars, and localized production in America through its investments of over $100 billion. Neither the huge currency appreciation, nor the restraints on trade, nor the transplanting of Japanese industry stateside prevented Japan’s trade surplus with the U.S. from rising to $75 billion by 2004.




(Source: US Dept. of Commerce, DH Smith)

Consider America’s trade deficit with China – it certainly is growing, having quadrupled between 1996 and 2004. Note that this was a period during which the dollar/renminbi exchange rate was stable to within 1.1%. During the exact same period, the Mexican peso declined by about one-third against the dollar. If the exchange rate were the principal factor in relative competitiveness, we might expect Mexico’s export performance in the United States market to be better than China’s. In fact, Mexico did increase its surplus by a factor of three — a strong performance, but not as strong as China’s.

Protect Environment Saving Bumf

Dude, that's just what I was thinking. We have to save that bumf.

(Airport, Jinan, China)

Burberry in China

Or as Morici said, "the most protectionist country in the history of the world."

Economists Gone Wild!

Or, "Dangerous New Phase of Financial Crisis (5)". It didn't take long at all for the anti-China recriminations over the financial crisis that I discussed in my last post to jump from the WaPo to other media.

University of Maryland professor Peter Morici just went berserk on Bloomberg TV tonight. Shouting down Hongkong-based anchorwoman Catherine Yang, he screamed that China is the most protectionist country in the history of the world, and predicted riots in the streets of Shanghai.

He is a regular guest, and always animated, but losing it and getting personal with the anchor has to be a bit unusual.

Dangerous New Phase of Financial Crisis (4)

From the official designation of China as a currency manipulator, it is but a short step to actually blaming China for the whole financial crisis, as the Washington Post does in an article entitled "An OPEC Lesson for China".

When I heard about the article, I thought it had to be satirical. I thought you would have to be joking to assert that it was the Chinese who did this to us, forcing cheap money on American financial institutions to on-lend to subprime borrowers who couldn't pay back. But apparently they're serious. Expect to hear more of this, as well as outraged push-back from the Chinese whose narrative is that it is American dissipation and profligacy that is responsible for the economic mess of the entire world.

Dangerous New Phase of Financial Crisis (1)

For no particularly good reason, Tim Geithner on Friday in his confirmation hearing set off after China, declaring it a currency manipulator in decidedly undiplomatic language.

China is a major trading partner and a principal creditor of the United States. At a time of financial stress maybe a little more delicacy is called for in this key relationship. Or if not, then batten down for capital flight and a dollar crisis.

FT reports China hits back in kind, says of Geithner: "This is a sign of his immaturity and his inability to do such an important job."

Not a good start. Not change I can believe in.

Just sayin'.

Dalian